Prone2Success Checklist

EcoAdvance European Project

PlanningDefine the scale ➤ Plan for the Long-Term

The issue

Long term plans, including monitoring, checking the effects and potentially re-adjusting has to be part of the planning process.


What some of our showcases say:

Mihai: most restortion projects timeframe is 5 years - but restoration takes its time


You can read up on this here:

GREECEDr Leonidas Vardakas

Research Associate - Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters


Scientists & Researchers

  • Social-economic importance
  • Stakeholder cooperation
  • Flexible project planning
  • Biodiversity

Leonidas Svardakas was selected as a Recreating Freshwater Showcase because he lead a restoration project in Greece. The project aimed to improve the conservation status of two endangered native fish species (Squalius keadicus and Pelasgus laconicus), both listed by the IUCN. The project focused on four main actions: (1) creating summer refugia to counteract river drying due to severe seasonal water abstraction, (2) eradicating invasive Gambusia holbrooki populations, (3) translocating native fish to safe habitats, and (4) establishing an ex situ backup population at the institute's facilities in Athens. He highlighted that while the ecological methods were scientifically sound, the project underestimated the complexity of social and institutional dynamics. Lack of engagement from local authorities and poor stakeholder cooperation—exemplified by the conflict with the farmer—were major obstacles. He emphasized that successful freshwater restoration requires not only technical expertise but also collaboration with social scientists to improve stakeholder communication, gain local support, and integrate socioeconomic realities into project design. As a lessons learned, Leonidas stressed the need for more flexible project planning, and recommended to incorporate socio-economic expertise from the outset to navigate local governance challenges and public perception. While the project had mixed success, it provided valuable experience and clear directions for improving the integration of ecological and social dimensions in future freshwater conservation initiatives.


Back