People and Projects Solving Freshwater Restoration Challenges

EcoAdvance European Project

Showcase category ➤ Recreating Freshwater Ecosystems

HUNGARY

Tamás Gruber

Living Rivers Programme Manager at WWF Hungary


EC / PolicyMakers / Funders / Government
My Projects
The Liberty Island Life project

Restoration of Liberty Island and side-branch Restoration of the Liberty Island and its side-arm on the Danube Using hydrological catchment model in flood forecast system

  • Key project facts
    The Liberty Island Life project revitalised a 3 km long side arm and brought back the natural floodplain forest of Liberty Island on the Danube River. The project also contributes to securing drinking water for the citizens of Pécs and Mohács and enhances opportunities for eco-friendly tourism and recreation in the area.

    WWF and its partners decided to revitalise the side arm and create a good quality semi-natural softwood forest on Liberty Island. Both are important alluvial habitats for many fish and birds.

    The key element of the revitalisation was the opening of the rock fill dam and the dredging of the silted up side arm. Before opening of the dam, the water pipes located inside had to be relocated under the riverbed. During the 5-year restoration process WWF planted native, alluvial softwood forest which is typical of floodplain areas. The non-native tree plantations and colonising invasive plants were removed.
  • What impact did these projects have?
    After the restoration, the water flowing around the island is always at least two meters deep. There is a continuous connection with the main branch of the Danube River. The slower waterflow attracts spawning fish. Some of the shallow water spots remained in the side-arm, providing habitat diversity, so as feeding habitat for birds.
  • What work challenges did you face and what approach did you take to solve them?
    One of the key challenge in the Liberty Island restoration project was motivating and coordinating a diverse group of stakeholders, including public authorities, NGOs, and private companies. This was overcome by identifying shared goals—such as improving water quality, restoring flow in the side branch, and enhancing habitat conditions—which created strong cooperation. Another major challenge was the removal and relocation of large volumes of sediment without affecting Danube navigation. This was solved through careful planning and reloading the sediment back into the main channel where it supported riverbed stability.
  • What lessons learned are transferable to other places/projects?
    • Reconnecting side branches improves ecosystem function:
    • Restoring lateral connectivity enhances flow, sediment transport, and habitat quality in large rivers.
    • Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential: Successful restoration depends on aligning the goals of public agencies, NGOs, and private partners.
    • Sediment management can support both ecology and river engineering: Relocating sediment to the main channel can aid ecological restoration while mitigating riverbed incision.
    • Restoration enhances ecosystem services: Beyond ecological gains, restored areas provide recreational, educational, and water quality benefits for local communities.
    • Natural processes matter: High-flow events are critical for flushing sediments and sustaining long-term restoration outcomes—highlighting the importance of integrating hydrological dynamics into planning.
My Focus and Approach
  • Lessons Learnt - Some recommendations for others?
    1. What’s most important:

      There is still large restoration potential along rivers in Central and East Europe, let’s not lose this momentum in the upcoming years! Besides improving their hydrological and ecological condition, river restoration projects will also improve a number of ecosystem services.

    2. Do this, not that: 

      Involve partners and stakeholders by setting mutually beneficial goals such as improved water supply, water quality, recreation value etc. instead of narrowing the focus on conservation targets only.

    3. Always start by:

      Build a diverse and motivated partnership with state bodies, NGOs, the corporate sector and local communities. To identify the problems which can only be solved by the cooperation of these partners.

    4. What to do when things get difficult…:

      communication and regular updates about the improvements and status of the area also after the project is finalized

    5. 5 simple steps to:
      1. Personal meetings among partners are essential to get to know each other and to harmonize the project activities even during the preparation phase
      2. Language barriers can be a challenge in cross-border projects. The targeted stakeholders may have to use a third language to exchange views which can make the meetings and workshops longer. This has to be calculated into the project preparation and implementation
      3. For efficient cooperation with stakeholders, start their involvement as early as possible and keep contact with them regularly. One round of discussions may not be enough. Take care to clarify the specific role/s of stakeholders among all of the project partners.
      4. Legal and administrative procedures can vary significantly across national borders – something to take into account in cross-border projects. It is difficult to harmonize the obligatory processes (environmental, water permissions) and secure all of the necessary permits from both countries in a timely manner. Thus, in cross-border cooperation, the permitting procedures have to be designed accordingly and include sufficient time buffers in the implementation plan.
      5. Ownership of the project by project partners is fundamental to the successful and timely development and implementation of the project.

    6. The biggest barrier and what I am trying to do about it:
      Our work can be successful with the participation of partners, but we experience many time overloaded people, while the stakeholders are usually demotivated and are not open to get to know new solutions instead of business-as-usual scenario.
My Journey
  • My journey:
    Hungary was a paradise of rivers and freshwaters before the waters were regulated. Despite the big loss there are still many opportunities to restore these ecosystems. I started work on river restoration a long time ago and seeing living rivers all over Europe is always inspiring. A big team works on freshwater topics in the Danube basin what I support from the freshwater programme manager position of WWF Hungary.
  • My Education:
    • Geographer, ELTE University (Hungary)
  • The Big Change:
    4 severe floods on Tisza around the year 2000 arose many conflicts and chance to alternative solutions appeared to turn toward working with nature. It was a motivation at that time for everyone who were interested in these topics.
  • Favourite part of the work I do:
    To gather experience from the ground, from our rivers and wetlands, and recognize the changes which happen in the nature without human impact.
Interview

Key Topics:

Key Topics

These relate to specific topics (e.g. technical solutions; restoration activities etc.) addressed within the showcase materials.

  • River side-arem rehabilitation
  • Hydrology
  • Long-term monitoring
  • Ecological status
  • River-floodplain connection
Prone2Success Factors Demonstrated:

Prone2Success Factors Demonstrated

These are the Prone2Success checklist factors which are highlighted within this showcase. More information on the Prone2Success checklist can be found here.

  • Measurable goals to improve ecological status
  • Supports WFD, NRL and other restoration policy goals
    Communicate/engage with stakeholders from the outset
  • Local planning processes are transparent / clearly understood
  • Include long term monitoring
NRL Restoration Categories:

NRL Restoration Categories

These are the restoration categories (listed under Annex VII of the European Nature Restoration Law (NRL) which are relevant to this showcase.

  • [2] Improve hydrological conditions
  • [6] Remove obsolete barriers
  • [7] Re-naturalise river beds
  • [8] Restore natural sedimentation
  • [9] Establish riparian buffers
  • [22] Improve connectivity across habitats
  • [24] Remove / control invasive species
  • [26] Restore fish spawning / nursery areas
Resources

Andrásfalvi Bertalan: A Duna mente népének ártéri gazdálkodása (Floodplain management of people /in the past/ along Danube) Molnár Géza: A Tiszánál (The Tisza)
Andrásfalvi Bertalan: A Duna mente népének ártéri gazdálkodása (Floodplain management of people /in the past/ along Danube)
Molnár Géza: A Tiszánál (The Tisza)

Restoration of the Liberty Island and its side-arm on the Danube Using hydrological catchment model in flood forecast system Restoration of Liberty Island and side-branch

Acknowledgements & Links

The Liberty Island LIFE project was managed by Viktoria Siposs with strong support of colleagues from the nature conservation and the communication department of WWF Hungary.

Back