People and Projects Solving Freshwater Restoration Challenges

EcoAdvance European Project

Showcase category ➤ Recreating Freshwater Ecosystems

HUNGARY

István Juhász

Chief technical expert  at West-transdanubian Water Directorate, Department of Water Protection and River Basin Management


Restoration Engineers / Consultants / Practitioners
My Projects
Aqua Pinka – Interreg ATHU115 - Key project facts:

AquaPinka low water management plan of Pinka The AquaPinka project - presentation AquaPinka_A_Pinka_kisvizi_vizgazdalkodasi_terve A Pinka fenntartható vízgazdálkodása (AquaPinka projekt eredményeinek bemutatása) A Pinka Csodálatos vízi világa AquaPinka - A Pinka Fenntartható Vízgazdálkodása The Pinka

The Pinka is a watercourse along the Hungarian-Austrian border that crosses and defines the border multiple times. Its water resources are utilized by both Austria and Hungary; however, the framework for water use is not supported by studies based on sufficiently detailed data. In the case of the Pinka, water management is only feasible based on jointly agreed principles, both in terms of quantity and quality. For the Pinka, it is primarily necessary to define the quantitative and qualitative expectations for inflowing and outflowing water at the border sections, from Woppendorf to the confluence. To maintain the good ecological status of the Pinka, a low-flow water management concept needs to be developed. This would enable the planning and preparation of best practices for the operation of fish passes, bypass channels, backwater replenishment, and power plants.

An important objective of the joint strategic plan for the border section of the Pinka is to prepare a unified management plan, which will allow both Parties to manage water resources, water uses, ecological requirements, flood protection, and interventions according to a common methodology.

The main outcomes of the project include, on the one hand, the assessment of the current water resources of the Pinka and the impacts of interventions affecting these resources, as well as the exploration of the relationship between the Pinka and the valley’s groundwater, and the documentation of pollutant loads and physico-chemical conditions of the watercourse. On the other hand, the project will provide a foundation for regulatory measures supporting bilateral water resource management.

  • What impact did these projects have on biodiversity, if any?
    The aim of the project is to provide guidance for increasingly frequent low-flow periods on how to ensure, in the future, the quantity of ecological water resources necessary to maintain good water quality. From the biodiversity pint of view, the project primarily focuses on fish.
  • What work challenges did you face and what approach did you take to solve them?
    The greatest challenge was that the Pinka is a transboundary river. Water resource management must be carried out jointly, but until now, there were no coordinated measurement series or shared databases upon which such management could be based. 

    Some measures have already been successfully established based on the unified knowledge of the two countries — for example, hydromorphological status improvement measures. However, financing their implementation will pose a major challenge.

    There are also regulatory action proposals that will need to be approved by the bilateral transboundary water commissions. Differences exist between the two countries' regulations — for instance, in matters concerning ecological water reserves — which require significant professional harmonization efforts. These include tasks such as the management and review of fish passes, the revision and issuance of operational permits, the development of appropriate methodologies, and the monitoring of compliance with the conditions defined in operational permits. .
  • What lessons learned are transferable to other places/projects?
    We collected all available knowledge (data) on the river. This allowed us to filter out the most important factors for the modelling and to identify the key issues. A competent expert team is needed together with the professional enthusiasm within the expert groups.
My Focus and Approach
  • Lessons Learnt - Some recommendations for others?
    1. What’s most important:

      All natural and artificial processes that influence the availability of water resources at a given time and place must be explored.

    2. Do this, not that: 

      In a watershed divided by a border, the representatives of the countries sharing the watershed must work together to achieve a good ecological state of the watercourse. The objectives and the measures must be formulated jointly by the representatives of the countries, which ensure that the entire watershed of the watercourse is treated as a single ecological unit in order to achieve the objectives.

    3. Always start by:

      Project planning should always begin with the formulation of well-thought-out ecological goals. Well-planned monitoring should be used to check whether these ecological goals have been met and when they will be met after the project. It is important to explore the natural and artificial loads that prevent or threaten the fulfillment of ecological goals. And finally, these loads must be eliminated with well-thought-out measures, or their impact reduced.

    4. What to do when things get difficult…:

      It is important to establish and continuously maintain close communication between the project partners and with the stakeholders. If the project gets into a difficult situation, good communication can help ease tensions and bring problems to the surface, and the communication between the project team and the stakeholders will able to lead to get a solution proposal for moving forward later.

    5. 5 simple steps to:
      1. Define ecological objectives to be achieved
      2. Using monitoring, determine what the current ecological state is and determine which ecological element prevents the achievement of a good ecological state
      3. Explore the possible loads, determine the extent of the loads
      4. Plan the possible state improvement measures and use models to prove which of the planned measures significantly improve the ecological state
      5. Discuss your project with local stakeholders

    6. The biggest barrier and what I am trying to do about it:
      The biggest obstacle in recent years was the situation of the COVID epidemic, which prevented the possibility of personal consultations in the project. Fortunately, with the development of IT and telecommunication tools and programs, numerous consultations could be conducted online, so the implementation of the project was not in jeopardy
My Journey
  • My journey:
    I am a Chief technical expert in a Water Authority in Hungary. I work in surface water resource management. My first and only workplace is the West-Transdanubian Water Directorate. I worked in several position in this workplace. Now I am a chief technical expert. I coordinate the Directorate’s tasks of the EU WFD. I participate in the performance of surface water resource management tasks and I also participates in the development and operation of the Mura and Rába flood forecasting models and the Gyöngyös-Sorok-Perint and Répce water resources management models. I have been teaching at the Herman Ottó Secondary Technical School for two years, where I teach water resource management.
  • My Education:
    • Environment Engineer (2007), University of West Hungary
    • Engineer-Teacher (2008), University of West Hungary
    • International Water Governance Manager (2022) University of Public Service
    • Doctoral PhD Education at Roth Gyula doctoral school of forestry and wildlife management sciences, University of Sopron (on going), my research deals with the hydrological point of view investigation of climatic effects and feedbacks related to land cover changes.
  • The Big Change:
    By exploring the connections between groundwater and surface water resources, more and more attention is being directed in surface water resource management to groundwater resources. The groundwater resources show a decreasing trend due to climate change, and therefore they are less and less able to provide a constant base water yield in the watercourses
  • Favourite part of the work I do:
    Cooperate with representatives of different fields in order to get to know the hydrological and the water resource management processes better and better to be able to predict extreme water management events (e.g. floods and droughts) through modeling.
Brief Overview

Interview

Key Topics:

Key Topics

These relate to specific topics (e.g. technical solutions; restoration activities etc.) addressed within the showcase materials.

  • River revitalization
  • Hydrology
  • Hydrogeology
Prone2Success Factors Demonstrated:

Prone2Success Factors Demonstrated

These are the Prone2Success checklist factors which are highlighted within this showcase. More information on the Prone2Success checklist can be found here.

  • Measurable goals to improve ecological status
  • Supports WFD, NRL and other restoration policy goals
  • Local planning processes are transparent / clearly understood
  • Include long term monitoring
  • Include adaptive management approaches (combined with monitoring)
  • Take climate change into account
NRL Restoration Categories:

NRL Restoration Categories

These are the restoration categories (listed under Annex VII of the European Nature Restoration Law (NRL) which are relevant to this showcase.

  • [2] Improve hydrological conditions
  • [12] Assist migration of provenances and species
  • [32] Reduce pollution (chemicals, urban/industrial wastewater, litter, plastics)
Resources

Hungary's river basin management planHungary's river basin management plan perfectly describes and presents the steps to achieve good ecological status and the possible measures necessary to achieve ecological status.

AquaPinka low water management plan of Pinka The AquaPinka project - presentation Evaluation of Macroinvertebrate Data Based on Autoecological Information Examination of the territorial distribution of ecological features Monitoring of urbanisation effects on water quality in the catchment of Rak Stream Using hydrological catchment model in flood forecast system AquaPinka_A_Pinka_kisvizi_vizgazdalkodasi_terve A Pinka fenntartható vízgazdálkodása (AquaPinka projekt eredményeinek bemutatása) A Pinka Csodálatos vízi világa AquaPinka - A Pinka Fenntartható Vízgazdálkodása The Pinka

Acknowledgements & Links

István Juhász, West-Transdanubian Water Directorate, Department of Water Protection and River Basin Management, H-9700 Szombathely, Vörösmarty u. 2.
This project is implemented with the support of the Interreg V-A AT-HU Program.
We would like to express our gratitude to the project participants (West-Transdanubian Water Directorate, Office of the Burgenland Provincial
AquaPinka - Interreg (interreg-athu.eu)

Back